[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200907262138.18716.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:38:18 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>,
Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...glemail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] au1xmmc: dev_pm_ops conversion
On Sunday 26 July 2009, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 09:39:30PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > Yes, they would. In general, you'd probably want to do something like this:
>
> > static struct dev_pm_ops au1xmmc_pmops = {
> > .resume = au1xmmc_resume,
> > .suspend = au1xmmc_suspend,
> > .freeze = au1xmmc_resume,
> > .thaw = au1xmmc_suspend,
>
> I'd have expected freeze and thaw to be the other way around here?
Sure, sorry.
.suspend() corresponds to .freeze() and .poweroff(), while .resume()
corresponds to .thaw() and .restore().
Best,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists