[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0907271814490.2682@ask.diku.dk>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:15:05 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: chris.mason@...cle.com, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 9/12] fs/btrfs: Correct redundant test
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
dir has already been tested. It seems that this test should be on the
recently returned value inode.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
// <smpl>
@r exists@
local idexpression x;
expression E;
position p1,p2;
@@
if (x == NULL || ...) { ... when forall
return ...; }
... when != \(x=E\|x--\|x++\|--x\|++x\|x-=E\|x+=E\|x|=E\|x&=E\|&x\)
(
*x == NULL
|
*x != NULL
)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
---
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
index c139222..d91b0de 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
@@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ static noinline int add_inode_ref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
return -ENOENT;
inode = read_one_inode(root, key->objectid);
- BUG_ON(!dir);
+ BUG_ON(!inode);
ref_ptr = btrfs_item_ptr_offset(eb, slot);
ref_end = ref_ptr + btrfs_item_size_nr(eb, slot);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists