linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 9/12] fs/btrfs: Correct redundant test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090727162839.GB895@think>
Date:	Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:28:39 -0400
From:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
To:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Cc:	linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/12] fs/btrfs: Correct redundant test

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 06:15:05PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
> 
> dir has already been tested.  It seems that this test should be on the
> recently returned value inode.
> 
> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
> follows: (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)

Thank you, this is queued up in my tree along with the
other btrfs patches you've sent.

-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/