[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1248991509.4901.9.camel@green>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:05:09 -0400
From: Arnaud Faucher <arnaud.faucher@...il.com>
To: Carlos Corbacho <carlos@...angeworlds.co.uk>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>,
Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...il.com>,
Erik Ekman <erik@...o.se>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] acer-wmi: switch driver to dev_pm_ops
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 18:53 -0400, Arnaud Faucher wrote :
> As of today, acer_platform_freeze() does not stop/reset any device, so,
> I agree with Rafael that for acer-wmi, .thaw() can be skipped. I had
> also tested this configuration and it was working like the non-patched
> code.
>
> Carlos, do you think that any acer-specific hardware could be switched
> off or reset inside acer_platform_freeze() ? If this was the case, we
> would have to wire .thaw()...
>
Should I send a new patch with only .freeze() and .restore() wired ?
---
Hope to see Cox and Torvalds reconcile...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists