lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <438397970908011436o29aad583p84ae40dc1df78756@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:36:23 -0700
From:	Kallol Biswas <nucleodyne@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Fwd: DMA sync operation on user space address

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kallol Biswas <nucleodyne@...il.com>
Date: Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:47 AM
Subject: DMA sync operation on user space address
To: linux-arm@...r.kernel.org


 I need to implement a DMA sync (flush and invalidate) operation on
user space address.

It seems that the routine blk_dma_flush_range() that is defined in
arch/arm/mm/blockops.c can do the sync operation. Also the function
takes virtual address.

Need to consult an ARM acrh manual to find out if the processor uses
virtual addresses to access the cache. It seems so.

The question is will there be protection or any other issue calling
the above routine from kernel space while the address used as argument
is a user space address?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ