[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0908011501470.3352@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Additional x86 fixes for 2.6.31-rc5
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> This is clearly better... now the semi-obvious question becomes if there
> is any way we can get compiler support to do better and migrate to that
> as the compiler allows.
Well, even if we had compiler support, we'd have to basically then wait
forever to make sure everybody has a supported compiler. So I think we're
better off not worrying too much about that - it's not going to happen any
time in the near future.
I've now tested my patch, and it seems to result in a working kernel too.
> In particular, if I remember right the problem with using __thread for
> percpu was exactly that the current cpuness can change almost anywhere,
> unless preemption is disabled.
That shouldn't matter. If it uses '%gs', it should all just work
automatically. But if gcc does something different for thread-local, it's
basically useless.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists