[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090803182412.CC15.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:32:11 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add walltime support for ring-buffer
>
> * KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > It can. but I don't think it is sufficient. On flight recorder
> > use-case, The tracing run more than one year. And, Administrator
> > only see last N sec log. (previous logs were overwritten by
> > ring-buffer go-around)
>
> That's definitely something we want to enable ASAP.
>
> I'm wondering why a single u64 timestamp is not enough to express
> the full, absolute range of time elapsed since bootup, in
> nanoseconds.
>
> That would make walltime a matter of pretty-printing only - we'd
> have to convert the u64 nsec timestamp into a walltime format,
> right?
>
> In fact we could change all the timestamps to be standardized along
> 'nanoseconds elapsed since 1970' or so - not nanoseconds since the
> last bootup. That still fits just fine within 64 bits - u64
> nanoseconds has a scope of 500+ years.
Ah, you are right. thanks correct me.
but I think ntp updating time storing is necessary too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists