lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 08:16:08 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Add 'percpu_read_stable()' interface for cacheable accesses * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: >> * Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote: >> >>> H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>>> Tejun Heo wrote: >>>>> Ingo, these patches might as well go through x86 tree. If you think >>>>> that would be better, please let me know. >>>>> >>>> Makes sense to me. I'll pull them into x86/percpu. >>> Cool, dropping from my tree then. >> >> We can delegate the contents of x86/percpu to you (the topic branch >> contains no patches over mainline right now) - i.e. we can pull those >> bits from you and they could also be in your tree to keep your testing >> & integration consistent. >> > > I just pushed out these branches into tip:x86/percpu. Thanks! (I'll test it and push it out into -tip:master.) > [...] We can zap those if there is a tree head you'd rather use. It's fine this way i think. Tejun: in the future you might want to offer up new x86-only bits based on tip:x86/percpu as git pulls. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists