linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Add 'percpu_read_stable()' interface for cacheable accesses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A767EE4.20702@zytor.com>
Date:	Sun, 02 Aug 2009 23:08:36 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Add 'percpu_read_stable()' interface for	cacheable
 accesses

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
>> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>> Ingo, these patches might as well go through x86 tree.  If you think
>>>> that would be better, please let me know.
>>>>
>>> Makes sense to me.  I'll pull them into x86/percpu.
>> Cool, dropping from my tree then.
> 
> We can delegate the contents of x86/percpu to you (the topic branch 
> contains no patches over mainline right now) - i.e. we can pull 
> those bits from you and they could also be in your tree to keep your 
> testing & integration consistent.
> 

I just pushed out these branches into tip:x86/percpu.  We can zap those 
if there is a tree head you'd rather use.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/