linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] Reiserfs/kill-bkl tree v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090803060944.GB20762@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 3 Aug 2009 08:09:44 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>,
	Bron Gondwana <brong@...tmail.fm>,
	Reiserfs <reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelmini@...il.com>,
	"Trenton D. Adams" <trenton.d.adams@...il.com>,
	Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>,
	Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...ware.it>,
	Marcel Hilzinger <mhilzinger@...uxnewmedia.de>,
	Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Reiserfs/kill-bkl tree v2


* Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@...hat.com> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> writes:
> 
> >> Yeah good idea. But again, I fear my laptop hasn't enough 
> >> memory to support big enough ramdisks mount points to host 
> >> selftests.
> >
> > Well, dont waste too much time on it (beyond the due diligence 
> > level) - Andi forgot that the right way to stress-test patches 
> > is to get through the review process and then through the 
> > integration trees which have far more test exposure than any 
> > single contributor can test.
> 
> What guideline can you offer as to what is "due diligence" level 
> of stress testing, as compared to delegating this task to 
> eyeballed reviews + incidental use on the integration trees?

The kind of testing the VFS tree itself gets is a good starting 
point i suspect - and it is a far more critical tree as it can 
affects all filesystems. AFAICS the VFS tree relies on linux-next 
and -mm for testing mostly and that's a good model IMO.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/