linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Add 'percpu_read_stable()' interface for cacheable accesses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090803060408.GA20762@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 3 Aug 2009 08:04:08 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Add 'percpu_read_stable()' interface for
	cacheable accesses


* Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:

> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Tejun Heo wrote:
> >>
> >> Ingo, these patches might as well go through x86 tree.  If you think
> >> that would be better, please let me know.
> >>
> > 
> > Makes sense to me.  I'll pull them into x86/percpu.
> 
> Cool, dropping from my tree then.

We can delegate the contents of x86/percpu to you (the topic branch 
contains no patches over mainline right now) - i.e. we can pull 
those bits from you and they could also be in your tree to keep your 
testing & integration consistent.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/