linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH take 2][RFC] fat: Save FAT root directory timestamps to volume label

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87zlafswci.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
Date:	Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:32:29 +0900
From:	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To:	Jörg Schummer <ext-jorg.2.schummer@...ia.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH take 2][RFC] fat: Save FAT root directory timestamps to volume label

Jörg Schummer <ext-jorg.2.schummer@...ia.com> writes:

> On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 13:47 +0200, ext OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
>> Jörg Schummer <ext-jorg.2.schummer@...ia.com> writes:
>
>> BTW, the patch has several bugs. fat_get_label_entry() doesn't check
>> IS_FREE(), is it right? fat_create_label_entry() doesn't initialize all
>> timestamp in the case of msdos. spin_lock() usage is wrong. and more...
>
> After reviewing the patch again, I did notice some additional problems
> (I suppose that was the "and more..."). If and when I have time again, I
> might take a closer look at it again.
>
> Thanks for your help until now!

No problem at all. Thanks for your work.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/