Message-ID: <4A788CBE.7080100@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 04 Aug 2009 22:32:14 +0300
From:	Izik Eidus <ieidus@...hat.com>
To:	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
CC:	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...hat.com>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/12] ksm: fix oom deadlock

Hugh Dickins wrote:
> There's a now-obvious deadlock in KSM's out-of-memory handling:
> imagine ksmd or KSM_RUN_UNMERGE handling, holding ksm_thread_mutex,
> trying to allocate a page to break KSM in an mm which becomes the
> OOM victim (quite likely in the unmerge case): it's killed and goes
> to exit, and hangs there waiting to acquire ksm_thread_mutex.
>
> Clearly we must not require ksm_thread_mutex in __ksm_exit, simple
> though that made everything else: perhaps use mmap_sem somehow?
> And part of the answer lies in the comments on unmerge_ksm_pages:
> __ksm_exit should also leave all the rmap_item removal to ksmd.
>
> But there's a fundamental problem, that KSM relies upon mmap_sem to
> guarantee the consistency of the mm it's dealing with, yet exit_mmap
> tears down an mm without taking mmap_sem.  And bumping mm_users won't
> help at all, that just ensures that the pages the OOM killer assumes
> are on their way to being freed will not be freed.
>
> The best answer seems to be, to move the ksm_exit callout from just
> before exit_mmap, to the middle of exit_mmap: after the mm's pages
> have been freed (if the mmu_gather is flushed), but before its page
> tables and vma structures have been freed; and down_write,up_write
> mmap_sem there to serialize with KSM's own reliance on mmap_sem.
>
> But KSM then needs to be careful, whenever it downs mmap_sem, to
> check that the mm is not already exiting: there's a danger of using
> find_vma on a layout that's being torn apart, or writing into page
> tables which have been freed for reuse; and even do_anonymous_page
> and __do_fault need to check they're not being called by break_ksm
> to reinstate a pte after zap_pte_range has zapped that page table.
>
> Though it might be clearer to add an exiting flag, set while holding
> mmap_sem in __ksm_exit, that wouldn't cover the issue of reinstating
> a zapped pte.  All we need is to check whether mm_users is 0 - but
> must remember that ksmd may detect that before __ksm_exit is reached.
> So, ksm_test_exit(mm) added to comment such checks on mm->mm_users.
>
> __ksm_exit now has to leave clearing up the rmap_items to ksmd,
> that needs ksm_thread_mutex; but shift the exiting mm just after the
> ksm_scan cursor so that it will soon be dealt with.  __ksm_enter raise
> mm_count to hold the mm_struct, ksmd's exit processing (exactly like
> its processing when it finds all VM_MERGEABLEs unmapped) mmdrop it,
> similar procedure for KSM_RUN_UNMERGE (which has stopped ksmd).
>
> But also give __ksm_exit a fast path: when there's no complication
> (no rmap_items attached to mm and it's not at the ksm_scan cursor),
> it can safely do all the exiting work itself.  This is not just an
> optimization: when ksmd is not running, the raised mm_count would
> otherwise leak mm_structs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
> ---
>   
Acked-by: Izik Eidus <ieidus@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists