[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830908041228w67bc6f7fh57e28f244e1923b3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:28:48 -0700
From: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
To: Benjamin Blum <bblum@...gle.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Makes procs file writable to move all threads by tgid
at once
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Benjamin Blum<bblum@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Hmm, the tasklist_lock section in fork() is entirely inside the
> read-lock. Presumably then iterating the threadgroup list to take all
> rwsems is safe from a race in which one thread escapes?
>
I think so - the write-side locking would be something like:
again:
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
find first not-yet-locked task t
while (t != group_leader) {
if (!down_write_trylock(&t->threadgroup_stability_mutex)) {
get_task_struct(t);
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
down_write(&t->threadgroup_stability_mutex);
put_task_struct(t);
goto again;
}
t = t->next_thread;
}
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists