[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090805144402.GD23992@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:44:02 +0200
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [11/19] HWPOISON: Refactor truncate to allow direct truncating of page v2
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 04:41:12PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > One question I had for the others (Andrew? other mm guys?) what is the
> > feelings of merging this feature? Leaving aside exact implementation
> > and just considering the high level design and cost/benefit. Last time
> > there were some people objecting, so I wonder the situation now? So
> > does anybody need more convincing? :)
>
> The main objection last time was that it was a bit too late in the
> release schedule.
>
> I can't remember anyone really questioning the basic feature itself.
I can't exactly remember. Maybe it was in a thread with Alan and/or
Arjan ;) I don't think the feature itself was questioned as much as
cost/benefit. Maybe I was wrong...
I just want to see everyone is happy with the basic idea ;)
> > Also I will just cc linux-arch. It would be interesting to know whether
> > powerpc, ia64, or s390 or others would be interested to use this feature?
>
> ia64 is interested (but no code so far) I talked to DaveM and he seems to be
> interested for sparc too. I would expect other server architectures to
> eventually use it as they get around to writing the necessary architecture
> specific glue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists