[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090806153756.GC6747@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 08:37:56 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, Benjamin Blum <bblum@...gle.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, oleg <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Makes procs file writable to move all threads by
tgid at once
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:24:46PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 08:19 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > > So yes, putting a rwsem in there sounds fine, you're already bouncing
> > > it.
> >
> > If the critical section is small, is an rwsem really better than a
> > straight mutex?
>
> Well, my understanding was that it needed to surround much, if not all,
> of clone(). That's a rather large bit of code.
That would indeed justify an rwsem! ;-)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists