[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090806224055.GH31579@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 23:40:55 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Albin Tonnerre <albin.tonnerre@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: sam@...nborg.org, hpa@...or.com, alain@...ff.lu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] Add support for LZO-compressed kernels for ARM
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 04:58:19PM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> This is the second part of patch. This part includes:
> - changes to ach/arch/boot/Makefile to make it easier to add new
> compression types
> - new piggy.lzo.S necessary for lzo compression
> - changes in arch/arm/boot/compressed/misc.c to allow the use of lzo or
> gzip, depending on the config
> - Kconfig support
FYI, with these patches applied and selecting GZIP method, I get
linker errors. I've been unable to track down what's going on, but
it appears to be a libgcc issue.
In spite of the decompressor being built as an EABI object, gcc seems
to be issuing calls to __umodsi3, which isn't in the EABI libgcc
(they're called something different - don't ask.)
So I think these patches need further testing and evaluation on ARM
before they can be merged. Moreover, I'd like to see some comparisons
between the _current_ gzip method, the new gzip method and the lzo
method on ARM.
I was going to get those numbers, but the platform I was going to run
the tests on has died on me today.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists