lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 7 Aug 2009 07:03:40 +0300
From:	Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
	Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>, gregkh@...e.de,
	Harald Hoyer <harald@...hat.com>,
	Scott James Remnant <scott@...ntu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Driver Core: devtmpfs - kernel-maintained tmpfs-based /dev

Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 11:18:05PM +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
> > So really, if devtmpfs compares to udev speeds then this just looks like
> > a devfs comeback.  Remember, devfs was really slow.
>
> Again, there is no "speed" for devtmpfs on its own, the device nodes
> just appear when the devices are added to the kernel, the speed of that
> depends on the device discovery within the kernel, nothing else.

So on bootup this would mean a lot of discovery.

I think we could get some big speedup, by just dumping the possible 
non-realized device list on bootup, and then just refine it on physical 
access.  This could make devtmpfs an acceptable replacement to static /dev.


Thanks!

--
Al

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists