[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090812102225.5a2e2305@mjolnir.ossman.eu>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:22:25 +0200
From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Page allocation failures in guest
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:43:46 +0300
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 08/12/2009 09:19 AM, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > Will it still trigger the OOM killer with this patch, or will things
> > behave slightly more gracefully?
> >
>
> I don't think you mentioned the OOM killer in your original report? Did
> it trigger?
>
I might have things backwards here, but I though the OOM killer started
doing its dirty business once you got that memory allocation failure
dump.
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
encryption.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists