[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A827EE9.7090102@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:35:53 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>
CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Page allocation failures in guest
On 08/12/2009 11:22 AM, Pierre Ossman wrote:
>>
>>> Will it still trigger the OOM killer with this patch, or will things
>>> behave slightly more gracefully?
>>>
>>>
>> I don't think you mentioned the OOM killer in your original report? Did
>> it trigger?
>>
>>
>
> I might have things backwards here, but I though the OOM killer started
> doing its dirty business once you got that memory allocation failure
> dump.
>
I don't think the oom killer should trigger on GFP_ATOMIC failures, but
don't know for sure. If you don't have a trace saying it picked a task
to kill, it probably didn't.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists