[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090812084613.GB32342@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:46:13 +0200
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>, tytso@....edu,
hch@...radead.org, mfasheh@...e.com, aia21@...tab.net,
hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk, swhiteho@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
Satoshi OSHIMA <satoshi.oshima.fk@...achi.com>,
Taketoshi Sakuraba <taketoshi.sakuraba.hc@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [16/19] HWPOISON: Enable .remove_error_page for migration aware file systems
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:23:31AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > page corruption, IMO, because by definition they should be able to
> > tolerate panic. But if they do not know about this change to -EIO
> > semantics, then it is quite possible to cause problems.
>
> There's no change really. You already have this problem with
> any metadata error, which can cause similar trouble.
> If the application handles those correctly it will also
> handle hwpoison correctly.
What do you mean metadata error?
To be clear, we're talking about safety given by a panic on any
memory error, versus safety of this hwpoison code (specifically
which removes dirty pagecache pages as -EIO).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists