linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Help Resource Counters Scale better (v4.1)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Aug 2009 01:19:08 +0900 (JST)
From:	"KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	"Prarit Bhargava" <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc:	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp,
	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, menage@...gle.com,
	andi.kleen@...el.com, xemul@...nvz.org, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Help Resource Counters Scale better (v4.1)

Prarit Bhargava さんは書きました：
>
>
> Balbir Singh wrote:
>> Hi, Andrew,
>>
>> Does this look better, could you please replace the older patch with
>> this one.
>>
>> 1. I did a quick compile test
>> 2. Ran scripts/checkpatch.pl
>>
>>
>>
>
> Andi Kleen suggested I use kernbench to profile the kernel.
>
> 2.6.31-rc5-git2 w/ CONFIG_RESOURCE_COUNTERS on
>
> Tue Aug 11 13:45:14 EDT 2009
> 2.6.31-rc5-git2-resources
> Average Half load -j 32 Run (std deviation):
> Elapsed Time 622.588 (119.243)
> User Time 4820.8 (962.286)
> System Time 9807.63 (2669.55)
> Percent CPU 2324 (167.236)
> Context Switches 2009606 (368703)
> Sleeps 1.24949e+06 (118210)
>
> Average Optimal load -j 256 Run (std deviation):
> Elapsed Time 770.97 (90.8685)
> User Time 5068.42 (750.933)
> System Time 21499.8 (12822.3)
> Percent CPU 3660 (1425.28)
> Context Switches 2.86467e+06 (971764)
> Sleeps 1.32784e+06 (129048)
>
> Average Maximal load -j Run (std deviation):
> Elapsed Time 757.018 (22.8371)
> User Time 4958.85 (644.65)
> System Time 24916.5 (11454.3)
> Percent CPU 4046.93 (1279.6)
> Context Switches 3.04894e+06 (826687)
> Sleeps 1.26053e+06 (146073)
>
>
> 2.6.31-rc5-git2 w/ CONFIG_RESOURCE_COUNTERS off
>
> Tue Aug 11 17:58:58 EDT 2009
> 2.6.31-rc5-git2-no-resources
> Average Half load -j 32 Run (std deviation):
> Elapsed Time 280.176 (21.1131)
> User Time 3558.51 (389.488)
> System Time 2393.87 (142.692)
> Percent CPU 2122.6 (50.5104)
> Context Switches 1.20474e+06 (131112)
> Sleeps 1062507 (59366.3)
>
> Average Optimal load -j 256 Run (std deviation):
> Elapsed Time 223.192 (42.7007)
> User Time 4243.19 (967.575)
> System Time 2649.57 (344.462)
> Percent CPU 2845.5 (856.217)
> Context Switches 1.52187e+06 (391821)
> Sleeps 1.28862e+06 (274222)
>
> Average Maximal load -j Run (std deviation):
> Elapsed Time 216.942 (45.4824)
> User Time 3860.46 (966.452)
> System Time 2782.17 (344.154)
> Percent CPU 2862.47 (720.904)
> Context Switches 1.43379e+06 (341021)
> Sleeps 1184325 (269392)
>
> 2.6.31-rc5-git2 w/ CONFIG_RESOURCE_COUNTERS on + patch
>
> Tue Aug 11 20:58:31 EDT 2009
> 2.6.31-rc5-git2-mem-patch
> Average Half load -j 32 Run (std deviation):
> Elapsed Time 285.788 (18.577)
> User Time 3483.14 (346.56)
> System Time 2426.37 (132.015)
> Percent CPU 2066.8 (80.3754)
> Context Switches 1.16588e+06 (134701)
> Sleeps 1048810 (59891.2)
>
> Average Optimal load -j 256 Run (std deviation):
> Elapsed Time 239.81 (14.0759)
> User Time 3797.7 (422.118)
> System Time 2622.74 (225.361)
> Percent CPU 2480.9 (446.735)
> Context Switches 1.37301e+06 (238886)
> Sleeps 1195957 (161659)
>
> Average Maximal load -j Run (std deviation):
> Elapsed Time 203.884 (8.59151)
> User Time 3578.02 (482.79)
> System Time 2759.9 (273.03)
> Percent CPU 2663.53 (450.476)
> Context Switches 1.33907e+06 (199658)
> Sleeps 1119205 (172089)
>
>
> ... The odd thing is that the run with the patch is still less than the
> run with CONFIG_RESOURCE_COUNTERS off.  It was so odd that I double
> checked that I actually built in RESOURCE_COUNTERS and had applied the
> patch, both of which I had done.
>
Hmm, CONFIG_RESOURCE_COUNTER actually means CONFIG_MEM_CGROUP ?


Then, more requests from me. (if you can)
Apply patch and set config ON. plz check your bench in following cases.

 1. boot with cgroup_disable=memory (will have the same effect as
    config=off)

    boot without above option...and
    2. Run your bench without mount memcg.
    3. Run your bench with memcg...as...
       #mount -tcgroup none /cgroups -omemory
       #mkdir /cgroups/test
       #echo $$ > /cgroups/test
       #kernbench.

Thanks,
-Kame






> P.
>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/