[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1250094123.4000.43.camel@mulgrave.site>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:22:03 -0500
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add kerneldoc for flush_scheduled_work()
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 10:13 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > > And here I was thinking kerneldoc doesn't actually work
> > > like that, but perhaps Randy fixed it so the initial
> > > description can line-wrap?
>
> Yes, that's what I thought too. If kerneldoc has been fixed then the
> description line certainly should get wrapped.
I really don't think it needs to be fixed: it's a feature not a bug. It
requires people writing kernel doc actually to think of one line
summaries.
LSI recently tried to submit a ten line wrapped summary which the
current feature makes it very easy to knock back and say this must be a
single line, so trim it and move the rest to the function description
body.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists