linux-kernel - Re: [RFC patch] init default dma_ops to prepare intel_iommu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090812181722.GA32653@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:17:22 -0700
From:	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To:	Luming Yu <luming.yu@...il.com>
Cc:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch] init default dma_ops to prepare intel_iommu_init failure

> Hi there,
> 
> On ia64 platform with dmar table and new upstream
> kernel(config_dmar_default_on enabled),
> if intel_iommu_init ends up without dma_ops initialized or other iommu
> failures.
> We got nothing to fall back. The following patch fixes it.
> 
x86/x86-64 also needs this fix. Please check the pci_swiotlb_init for x86/64.

> Please review. If make sense, please apply.
> 
> **The patch is enclosed in text attachment*
> **Using web client to send the patch* *
> **below is for review, please apply attached  patch*/
> 
> Thanks,
> Luming
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yu Luming <luming.yu@...el.com>
> 
> arch/ia64/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c |   14 ++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c
> index 223abb1..d5dcaf5 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c
> @@ -46,15 +46,13 @@ void __init swiotlb_dma_init(void)
> 
>  void __init pci_swiotlb_init(void)
>  {
> -	if (!iommu_detected || iommu_pass_through) {

This check can not be removed. Otherwise, swiotlb_dma_ops will always override
previous dma_ops value.

I think you can change this check to something like:
	if (!dma_ops || iommu_pass_through) {
With this change, checking iommu_detected is unnecesary because checking dma_ops
covers it.

>  #ifdef CONFIG_IA64_GENERIC
> -		swiotlb = 1;
> -		printk(KERN_INFO "PCI-DMA: Re-initialize machine vector.\n");
> -		machvec_init("dig");
> -		swiotlb_init();
> -		dma_ops = &swiotlb_dma_ops;
> +	swiotlb = 1;
> +	printk(KERN_INFO "PCI-DMA: Re-initialize machine vector.\n");
> +	machvec_init("dig");
> +	swiotlb_init();
> +	dma_ops = &swiotlb_dma_ops;
>  #else
> -		panic("Unable to find Intel IOMMU");
> +	panic("Unable to find Intel IOMMU");
>  #endif
> -	}
>  }



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/