[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1250036727.26788.7.camel@obelisk.thedillows.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:25:27 -0400
From: David Dillow <dave@...dillows.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>, Harald Hoyer <harald@...hat.com>,
Scott James Remnant <scott@...ntu.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Driver Core: devtmpfs - kernel-maintained tmpfs-based
/dev
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 16:55 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > No, not really. It isn't hard to make a static /dev, or a rescue initrd
> > for the cases with dynamic device numbers.
>
> There's a world between strictly controlled embedded and fully general
> distributions.
Sure, and I've acknowledged that. But it doesn't mean this needs a
kernel solution.
> I want a dynamic /dev, but a fast one that doesn't need initrd or
> slows down booting.
So use Eric/Arjan's program that does it in 60ms -- you get a
dynamic /dev, no initrd, fast boot, and no kernel changes required.
It remains to be seen how much it costs to do it in user space vs kernel
space. Arjan -- do you have a pointer to your program? Perhaps I can
shake loose some time to test that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists