[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090812003433.GA25392@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:34:33 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: David Dillow <dave@...dillows.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>, Harald Hoyer <harald@...hat.com>,
Scott James Remnant <scott@...ntu.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Driver Core: devtmpfs - kernel-maintained tmpfs-based
/dev
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 08:25:27PM -0400, David Dillow wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 16:55 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > No, not really. It isn't hard to make a static /dev, or a rescue initrd
> > > for the cases with dynamic device numbers.
> >
> > There's a world between strictly controlled embedded and fully general
> > distributions.
>
> Sure, and I've acknowledged that. But it doesn't mean this needs a
> kernel solution.
>
> > I want a dynamic /dev, but a fast one that doesn't need initrd or
> > slows down booting.
>
> So use Eric/Arjan's program that does it in 60ms -- you get a
> dynamic /dev, no initrd, fast boot, and no kernel changes required.
Their program only handles it for a reconstruction of /dev based on
sysfs one time at boot. It does not handle things that are added or
discovered by the system after that, you need udev for that.
So it's a great hack for boot time stuff, but not a complete /dev
management replacement like this code can be for numerous systems.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists