[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1250151801.29180.192.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:23:21 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Luming Yu <luming.yu@...il.com>
Cc: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch] clean up swiotlb check in intel_iommu_init
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 11:11 +0800, Luming Yu wrote:
>
> Since swiotlb is an fall back option that might have
> initialized. We don't need to stop intel_iommu_init
> because of swiotlb..
>
> Please review. If make sense, please apply.
It doesn't apply to the iommu-2.6.git tree.
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists