[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3877989d0908122302x3bfc767agbca663ddbc7b40b5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:02:11 +0800
From: Luming Yu <luming.yu@...il.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: dwmw2@...radead.org, fenghua.yu@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC patch] clean up swiotlb check in intel_iommu_init
>>
>> Since swiotlb is an fall back option that might have
>> initialized. We don't need to stop intel_iommu_init
>> because of swiotlb..
>
> I think that this doesn't work on X86; breaks "soft" boot option.
Assumption is that swiotlb is default dma_ops.
I got this patch when working on ia64, will check x86 later.
But it is only needed when most of us agree that swiotlb should be
the default.
>
>
>> Please review. If make sense, please apply.
>>
>> **The patch is enclosed in text attachment*
>> **Using web client to send the patch* *
>> **below is for review, please apply attached patch*/
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Luming
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yu Luming <luming.yu@...el.com>
>>
>> intel-iommu.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
>> index 2314ad7..246acb9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
>> @@ -3194,7 +3194,7 @@ int __init intel_iommu_init(void)
>> * Check the need for DMA-remapping initialization now.
>> * Above initialization will also be used by Interrupt-remapping.
>> */
>> - if (no_iommu || (swiotlb && !iommu_pass_through) || dmar_disabled)
>> + if (no_iommu || dmar_disabled)
>> return -ENODEV;
>>
>> iommu_init_mempool();
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists