[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090813122456P.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:25:39 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: luming.yu@...il.com
Cc: dwmw2@...radead.org, fenghua.yu@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC patch] clean up swiotlb check in intel_iommu_init
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:11:27 +0800
Luming Yu <luming.yu@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Since swiotlb is an fall back option that might have
> initialized. We don't need to stop intel_iommu_init
> because of swiotlb..
I think that this doesn't work on X86; breaks "soft" boot option.
> Please review. If make sense, please apply.
>
> **The patch is enclosed in text attachment*
> **Using web client to send the patch* *
> **below is for review, please apply attached patch*/
>
> Thanks,
> Luming
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Luming <luming.yu@...el.com>
>
> intel-iommu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
> index 2314ad7..246acb9 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
> @@ -3194,7 +3194,7 @@ int __init intel_iommu_init(void)
> * Check the need for DMA-remapping initialization now.
> * Above initialization will also be used by Interrupt-remapping.
> */
> - if (no_iommu || (swiotlb && !iommu_pass_through) || dmar_disabled)
> + if (no_iommu || dmar_disabled)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> iommu_init_mempool();
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists