[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3877989d0908122011n27589ff8wfc6d6b50912496c6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:11:27 +0800
From: Luming Yu <luming.yu@...il.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [RFC patch] clean up swiotlb check in intel_iommu_init
Hi there,
Since swiotlb is an fall back option that might have
initialized. We don't need to stop intel_iommu_init
because of swiotlb..
Please review. If make sense, please apply.
**The patch is enclosed in text attachment*
**Using web client to send the patch* *
**below is for review, please apply attached patch*/
Thanks,
Luming
Signed-off-by: Yu Luming <luming.yu@...el.com>
intel-iommu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
index 2314ad7..246acb9 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
@@ -3194,7 +3194,7 @@ int __init intel_iommu_init(void)
* Check the need for DMA-remapping initialization now.
* Above initialization will also be used by Interrupt-remapping.
*/
- if (no_iommu || (swiotlb && !iommu_pass_through) || dmar_disabled)
+ if (no_iommu || dmar_disabled)
return -ENODEV;
iommu_init_mempool();
Download attachment "6" of type "application/octet-stream" (496 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists