[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A843565.3010104@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:46:45 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"Dike, Jeffrey G" <jeffrey.g.dike@...el.com>,
"Yu, Wilfred" <wilfred.yu@...el.com>,
"Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@...el.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] respect the referenced bit of KVM guest pages?
Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:31:41PM +0800, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> For zones it is a fixed value, which is available in
>> /proc/zoneinfo
>
> On my 64bit desktop with 4GB memory:
>
> DMA inactive_ratio: 1
> DMA32 inactive_ratio: 4
> Normal inactive_ratio: 1
>
> The biggest zone DMA32 has inactive_ratio=4. But I guess the
> referenced bit should not be ignored on this typical desktop
> configuration?
We need to ignore the referenced bit on active anon pages
on very large systems, but it could indeed be helpful to
respect the referenced bit on smaller systems.
I have no idea where the cut-off between them would be.
Maybe at inactive_ratio <= 4 ?
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists