[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908131831580.28962@orbit.lan>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:32:11 +0300 (EEST)
From: Jan Wagner <jwagner@...p.hut.fi>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: 32-bit sys/times.h incorrect return value (fwd)
Hi,
we see times() return a really large positive value like 0x66693CF1 i.e.
signed int32 +1718172913 just a few minutes after booting.
Note that clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC) works correctly and returns the
uptime. While times() +1718172913/100Hz time is in no relation to uptime.
Checking 'man 2 times': "Since Linux 2.6, this point is (2^32/HZ) - 300 (i.e.,
about 429 million) seconds before system boot time. [...] the returned value
may overflow the range of clock_t [...]"
Hence in theory on a 32-bit platform where clock_t is signed 32-bit, at first
times() should return negative values.
Then 300 seconds later they should become positive. Correct?
This should also happen via glibc times() call. There the times()
./sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/times.c
simply does
clock_t ret = INTERNAL_SYSCALL (times, err, 1, buf);
with no extra "+- some constant".
In the kernel all jiffies and times syscall related handling is 64-bit:
---------
amn@...tics:/home/etu/Desktop/linux-2.6.30.3/include$ fgrep INITIAL_JIFFIES
linux/jiffies.h:#define INITIAL_JIFFIES ((unsigned long)(unsigned int)
(-300*HZ))
kernel/sys.c: return (long) jiffies_64_to_clock_t(get_jiffies_64());
kernel/time.c:u64 get_jiffies_64(void)
kernel/time.c: ret = jiffies_64;
---------
On 32-bit platforms and signed int32 clock_t it should take at least
octave:1> 2^31/(24*60*60 * 100)
ans = 248.55
octave:2> (2^31/100 - 300)/(24*60*60)
ans = 248.55
days until the positive times() return value wraps back to smallest negative
signed 32-bit int.
However, two bugs(?) :
1) times() return value after 1080 'uptime' seconds is 0x66693CF1, why?
Expected value would be (1080-300)*100Hz = 78000 = 0x000130B0 !
2) the times() wraps to negative only after 50 days uptime. Following the
intention of INITIAL_JIFFIES, how is this 50-day warp supposed to reveal
wrapping bugs right at 300 seconds after boot?
2) on 64-bit platforms, clock_t is 64-bit. There times() does not wrap after 50
days, however it still starts at 0x000000006669**** !?
Any ideas?
- Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists