linux-kernel - Re: Regression in ACPI in 2.6.31-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0908122350560.22946@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:53:15 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To:	Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm@...49152.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression in ACPI in 2.6.31-rc5

> I had two drivers stop working in 2.6.31 that were working fine in 2.6.30. 
> They are iwlagn and sky2. If i pass acpi=off to the kernel, they work as 
> expected.

the bug report for this issue is here:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940

is it possible to bisect which commit between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31-rc5
caused this regression?

Please attach the dmesg from the working 2.6.30
and the acpi=off 2.6.31 to the bug report so i can compare
them to the failing 2.6.31

thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/