linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090813140407.1a9a909c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:04:07 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...or.com,
	peterz@...radead.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de, jengelh@...ozas.de
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net tree

Hi Dave,

On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:33:25 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:47:05 +1000
> 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> > arch/x86/include/asm/socket.h between commits
> > 49c794e94649020248e37b78db16cd25bad38b4f ("net: implement a SO_PROTOCOL
> > getsockoption") and 0d6038ee76f2e06b79d0465807f67e86bf4025de ("net:
> > implement a SO_DOMAIN getsockoption") from the net tree and commit
> > 73a2d096fdf23aa841f7595d114a11ec85a85e4d ("x86: remove all now-duplicate
> > header files") from the tip tree.
> > 
> > The latter change supercedes the former ones, so I used the latter.
> 
> That should be the correct merge resolution, thanks!

OK, thanks for the confirmation.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped