[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200908141849.19797.a1426z@gawab.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:49:19 +0300
From: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
To: ngupta@...are.org
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: compcache as a pre-swap area
Nitin Gupta wrote:
> On 08/14/2009 09:32 AM, Al Boldi wrote:
> > So once compcache fills up, it will start to age its contents into normal
> > swap?
>
> This is desirable but not yet implemented. For now, if 'backing swap' is
> used, compcache will forward incompressible pages to the backing swap
> device. If compcache fills up, kernel will simply send further swap-outs to
> swap device which comes next in priority.
Ok, this sounds acceptable for now.
The important thing now is to improve performance to a level comparable to a
system with normal ssd-swap. Do you have such a comparisson?
Another interresting benchmark would be to use compcache in a maximized
configuration, ie. on a system w/ 1024KB Ram assign 960KB for compcache and
leave 64KB for the system, and then see how it performs. This may easily
pinpoint any bottlenecks compcache has, if any.
Also, a link to the latest patch against .30 would be helpful.
Thanks!
--
Al
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists