[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0908161519280.2782@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 15:22:29 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Threaded interrupt handlers broken?
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Sunday 16 August 2009 12:14:36 Michael Buesch wrote:
> I need the following patch for threaded IRQs to work.
> The first hunk obviously is incorrect. But without it the thread_fn is
> never called.
>
> Index: wireless-testing/kernel/irq/manage.c
> ===================================================================
> --- wireless-testing.orig/kernel/irq/manage.c 2009-08-15 22:22:07.000000000 +0200
> +++ wireless-testing/kernel/irq/manage.c 2009-08-16 14:05:23.000000000 +0200
> @@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ static int irq_thread(void *data)
> atomic_inc(&desc->threads_active);
>
> spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
> - if (unlikely(desc->status & IRQ_DISABLED)) {
> + if (0&&unlikely(desc->status & IRQ_DISABLED)) {
So the interrupt is marked disabled. How do you setup the handler ?
And what does the primary handler do ? Can you post your driver code please?
> /*
> * CHECKME: We might need a dedicated
> * IRQ_THREAD_PENDING flag here, which
> @@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ static int irq_thread(void *data)
> action->thread_fn(action->irq, action->dev_id);
> }
>
> - wake = atomic_dec_and_test(&desc->threads_active);
> + wake = !atomic_dec_and_test(&desc->threads_active);
So you wake when the thread counter is != 0 after the decrement.
#define atomic_dec_and_test(v) (atomic_sub_return(1, (v)) == 0)
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists