[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090816134610.GA6266@localhost>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:46:10 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: "linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"jens.axboe@...cle.com" <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
"alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk" <alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] PM/Hibernate: Do not release preallocated memory
unnecessarily (rev. 2)
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 07:05:09AM +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 May 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 08:22:38AM +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> > >
> > > Since the hibernation code is now going to use allocations of memory
> > > to create enough room for the image, it can also use the page frames
> > > allocated at this stage as image page frames. The low-level
> > > hibernation code needs to be rearranged for this purpose, but it
> > > allows us to avoid freeing a great number of pages and allocating
> > > these same pages once again later, so it generally is worth doing.
> > >
> > > [rev. 2: Change the strategy of preallocating memory to allocate as
> > > many pages as needed to get the right image size in one shot (the
> > > excessive allocated pages are released afterwards).]
> >
> > Rafael, I tried out your patches and found doubled memory shrink speed!
> >
> > [ 579.641781] PM: Preallocating image memory ... done (allocated 383900 pages, 128000 image pages kept)
> > [ 583.087875] PM: Allocated 1535600 kbytes in 3.43 seconds (447.69 MB/s)
>
> Unfortunately, I'm observing a regression and a huge one.
>
> On my Atom-based test box with 1 GB of RAM after a fresh boot and starting X
> with KDE 4 there are ~256 MB free. To create an image we need to free ~300 MB
> and that takes ~2 s with the old code and ~15 s with the new one.
>
> It helps to call shrink_all_memory() once with a sufficiently large argument
> before the preallocation.
The 10 fold slowdown may be related to swapping IO:
shrink_all_memory() tends to be reclaiming less anon pages.
Is this box running on SSD? (Which can be slow on random writes.)
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists