lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:48:01 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc:	"linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
	<linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>,
	"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"jens.axboe@...cle.com" <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	"alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk" <alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] PM/Hibernate: Do not release preallocated memory unnecessarily (rev. 2)

On Sunday 16 August 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 07:05:09AM +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday 05 May 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 08:22:38AM +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> > > > 
> > > > Since the hibernation code is now going to use allocations of memory
> > > > to create enough room for the image, it can also use the page frames
> > > > allocated at this stage as image page frames.  The low-level
> > > > hibernation code needs to be rearranged for this purpose, but it
> > > > allows us to avoid freeing a great number of pages and allocating
> > > > these same pages once again later, so it generally is worth doing.
> > > > 
> > > > [rev. 2: Change the strategy of preallocating memory to allocate as
> > > >  many pages as needed to get the right image size in one shot (the
> > > >  excessive allocated pages are released afterwards).]
> > > 
> > > Rafael, I tried out your patches and found doubled memory shrink speed!
> > >
> > > [  579.641781] PM: Preallocating image memory ... done (allocated 383900 pages, 128000 image pages kept)
> > > [  583.087875] PM: Allocated 1535600 kbytes in 3.43 seconds (447.69 MB/s)
> > 
> > Unfortunately, I'm observing a regression and a huge one.
> > 
> > On my Atom-based test box with 1 GB of RAM after a fresh boot and starting X
> > with KDE 4 there are ~256 MB free.  To create an image we need to free ~300 MB
> > and that takes ~2 s with the old code and ~15 s with the new one.
> > 
> > It helps to call shrink_all_memory() once with a sufficiently large argument
> > before the preallocation.
> 
> The 10 fold slowdown may be related to swapping IO:

I guess it is.

> shrink_all_memory() tends to be reclaiming less anon pages.
> 
> Is this box running on SSD? (Which can be slow on random writes.)

No, on a normal spinning-plate HDD (2.5'').

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ