[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090817092047.GB21269@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:20:47 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [boot crash] Re: [tip:x86/mce3] x86, mce: use 64bit machine
check code on 32bit
* Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> One possibility is: if the BIOS doesn't clear status in banks, new
> mce codes will try to log such junks. If the junk is totally junk
> but can be decoded as a valid log with MISCV or ADDRV bit, and if
> the cpu try to access register which is not implemented (e.g.
> IA32_MCi_MISC/ADDR), then such access might cause a general
> protection exception. (ref. ASDM 3A 15.3.2.3)
btw., that reminds me: mce_rdmsrl() needs to be fixed to use
rdmsrl_safe() and it should emit a WARN_ONCE() if it ever hits an
error while trying to access registers.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists