[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A8B26F8.3000301@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:11:04 -0700
From: Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...e.hu,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, jiayingz@...gle.com,
mbligh@...gle.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Move tracepoint callbacks into DEFINE
On 08/18/2009 07:19 AM, Jason Baron wrote:
> this makes sense...Ingo also suggested having the two high level
> tracepoints be 'TRACE_EVENT' style. That is we should be able to
> register with the syscall entry and get the *all* the syscall numbers
> and arguments, and likewise on exit we should be able to get *all*
> syscall exit return values. see:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125008740803571&w=2
>
> does this patch allow/do that?
It does allow this, and I am working on a patch to do it. There are a
few naming conflicts between trace_syscalls.c and the stuff that ftrace
generates for "TRACE_EVENT(syscall_enter, ...)", but I will post soon
with a patch to resolve this.
Thanks,
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists