linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: suspend tree build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090818221301.GA20676@linux-sh.org>
Date:	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:13:01 +0900
From:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: suspend tree build failure

On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:43:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 August 2009, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Rafael,
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > Today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig) failed like this:
> > 
> > drivers/base/power/main.c: In function 'device_pm_init':
> > drivers/base/power/main.c:59: error: 'struct dev_pm_info' has no member named 'lock'
> 
> Argh, that line shouldn't even be there.
> 
> > Caused by commit ea8e84f27325d9ddc7692f728a10e0a22cd59f52 ("PM: Introduce
> > core framework for run-time PM of I/O devices (rev. 17)") from the
> > suspend tree.  The i386 defconfig does not have CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME set but
> > does have CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=y ...
> > 
> > I have reverted that commit for today.
> > 
> > When you add a new CONFIG variable, it is worth doing test builds both
> > with it turned on and turned off ...
> 
> I tested it, but I broke the patch afterwards by mistake. :-(
> 
> Sorry for the trouble, I've just pushed an updated tree.
> 
Argh, and rebased in the process, again. This is now the second time in
as many days this has been rebased, meaning I have to throw away my topic
branch and re-create. I thought this was going to remain stable? I would
like the SH runtime PM code to get some coverage in -next, but I can't
merge it in to my tree if the suspend tree keeps rebasing every day.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/