[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090818101215.aba4d0bf.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:12:15 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: David Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, xfs-masters@....sgi.com
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
Felix Blyakher <felixb@....com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the xfs tree got a conflict in
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h between commit
bc990f5cb424cdca9dda866785d088e2c2110ecc ("xfs: fix locking in
xfs_iget_cache_hit") from Linus' tree and commit
370f048214b4e9aa2102fa3c454ae1374da287c5 ("xfs: add more statics & drop
some unused functions") from the xfs tree.
Just context changes (add/remove). I fixed it up (see below) and can
carry the fix as necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h
index 5912060,23e7e7e..0000000
--- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h
@@@ -48,8 -48,6 +48,7 @@@ int xfs_reclaim_inode(struct xfs_inode
int xfs_reclaim_inodes(struct xfs_mount *mp, int mode);
void xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag(struct xfs_inode *ip);
+void __xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag(struct xfs_perag *pag, struct xfs_inode *ip);
- void xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag(struct xfs_inode *ip);
void __xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag(struct xfs_mount *mp, struct xfs_perag *pag,
struct xfs_inode *ip);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists