[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1250680993.7583.350.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:23:13 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Leon Woestenberg <leon.woestenberg@...il.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linux-Kernel List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: spin_is_locked() broken for uniprocessor?
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 13:16 +0200, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Alan Cox<alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:38:06 +0100
> >
> > in drivers because there is driver code that uses spin_is_locked() in
> > fairly sensible fashion when dealing with locking.
> >
> One use is to measure lock contention hits on a particular spin lock.
>
>
> However I wonder if there are tracing capabilities to measure lock
> contention on a particular lock?
lock_stat no good for you?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists