[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090819112554.GY12579@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:25:54 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jeff@...zik.org, htejun@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH] libata: use single threaded work queue
Hi,
On boxes with lots of CPUs, we have so many kernel threads it's not
funny. The basic problem is that create_workqueue() creates a per-cpu
thread, where we could easily get by with a single thread for a lot of
cases.
One such case appears to be ata_wq. You want at most one per pio drive,
not one per CPU. I'd suggest just dropping it to a single threaded wq.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
index 072ba5e..0d78628 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -6580,7 +6580,7 @@ static int __init ata_init(void)
{
ata_parse_force_param();
- ata_wq = create_workqueue("ata");
+ ata_wq = create_singlethread_workqueue("ata");
if (!ata_wq)
goto free_force_tbl;
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists