lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:05:17 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>
Cc:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	fweisbec@...il.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	peterz@...radead.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
	jiayingz@...gle.com, mbligh@...gle.com,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Create generic syscall TRACE_EVENTs


* Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com> wrote:

> On 08/18/2009 06:32 PM, Li Zefan wrote:
> > It would be much better to see a sample output of these TRACE_EVENTs,
> > so we'll see the what's the output if a syscall has less than 6 args.
> > 
> > And I guess it should be "(%lx, %lx, ..., %lx)"? Otherwise I think we'll
> > see some negative values.
> 
> Thanks, you're right -- the args should be unsigned long.  Whether they
> are hex or decimal doesn't matter to me, but I guess that does make
> pointers easier to spot.
> 
> Here's some output that I get on x86_64:
> 
> > # tail trace
> >             tail-1106  [000] 113218.474657: syscall_enter: NR 2 (7f2d34dd38f0, 0, 7f2d35009010, 5, 4, ffffffffffffffb0)
> > 
> >             tail-1106  [000] 113218.474809: syscall_enter: NR 5 (3, 7f2d35009040, 7f2d35009040, 5, 4, ffffffffffffffb0)
> > 
> >             tail-1106  [000] 113218.474855: syscall_enter: NR 9 (0, 50d3ad0, 1, 2, 3, 0)
> > 
> >             tail-1106  [000] 113218.474946: syscall_enter: NR 3 (3, 7f2d2f9a0000, 5e22, 2, 3, 0)
> > 
> >             tail-1106  [000] 113218.475673: syscall_enter: NR 2 (7fff5e42a654, 0, 0, 7fff5e429600, 80, 3)
> 
> It's very raw indeed, but that's what Ingo asked for. :) The 
> extra args show up as whatever happened to be in those registers.

If the syscalls are handled as a single tracepoint, then they 
cannot really have per syscall properties.

The per syscall tracepoints on the other hand give very finegrained 
information.

Note that via the use of filters one can limit the generic 
tracepoint to only output certain syscall NRs, and only with 
certain parameters.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ