[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A8B6C01.1060503@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:05:37 -0700
From: Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...e.hu,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, jiayingz@...gle.com,
mbligh@...gle.com, Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Create generic syscall TRACE_EVENTs
On 08/18/2009 06:32 PM, Li Zefan wrote:
> It would be much better to see a sample output of these TRACE_EVENTs,
> so we'll see the what's the output if a syscall has less than 6 args.
>
> And I guess it should be "(%lx, %lx, ..., %lx)"? Otherwise I think we'll
> see some negative values.
Thanks, you're right -- the args should be unsigned long. Whether they
are hex or decimal doesn't matter to me, but I guess that does make
pointers easier to spot.
Here's some output that I get on x86_64:
> # tail trace
> tail-1106 [000] 113218.474657: syscall_enter: NR 2 (7f2d34dd38f0, 0, 7f2d35009010, 5, 4, ffffffffffffffb0)
>
> tail-1106 [000] 113218.474809: syscall_enter: NR 5 (3, 7f2d35009040, 7f2d35009040, 5, 4, ffffffffffffffb0)
>
> tail-1106 [000] 113218.474855: syscall_enter: NR 9 (0, 50d3ad0, 1, 2, 3, 0)
>
> tail-1106 [000] 113218.474946: syscall_enter: NR 3 (3, 7f2d2f9a0000, 5e22, 2, 3, 0)
>
> tail-1106 [000] 113218.475673: syscall_enter: NR 2 (7fff5e42a654, 0, 0, 7fff5e429600, 80, 3)
It's very raw indeed, but that's what Ingo asked for. :) The extra args
show up as whatever happened to be in those registers.
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists