[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908200916300.14844@makko.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
cc: avi@...hat.com, gleb@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] eventfd: new EFD_STATE flag
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Davide,
> Looks like I got an ack from Avi and no comments from others,
> so the following patchset is identical to the last RFC.
> Can it be merged for 2.6.32?
> Thanks!
I briefly looked at this while in vacation, although I did not reply
hoping the horrible feeling about this code would go away.
It didn't.
I find this to be an ugly and ad-hoc multiplexing of eventfd with added
functionalities of questionable general use.
I'm pretty sure you can do better on KVM side, to solve the problem w/out
littering eventfd.
- Davide
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists