[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A8D8A28.2050004@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:38:48 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, gleb@...hat.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] eventfd: new EFD_STATE flag
On 08/20/2009 07:20 PM, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> I briefly looked at this while in vacation, although I did not reply
> hoping the horrible feeling about this code would go away.
> It didn't.
> I find this to be an ugly and ad-hoc multiplexing of eventfd with added
> functionalities of questionable general use.
> I'm pretty sure you can do better on KVM side, to solve the problem w/out
> littering eventfd.
>
>
While we could argue about this my feeling is that we should drop this,
at least until we can quantify what benefit it has and whether there are
any Davide-acceptable alternatives.
In the meanwhile, we can let vhost-net support edge-triggered interrupts
only, let qemu terminate those eventfds and convert then to
level-triggered interrupts (which it can then inject using the existing
ioctl). It will keep vhost-net and kvm simpler at the cost of some
performance penalty to guests using level interrupts. These suck anyway
so we'll point users at msi.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which thisb
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists