[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1250802680.2754.15.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:11:20 -0700
From:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To:	Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
Cc:	"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"andi@...stfloor.org" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: add /proc/cpuinfo/physical id quirks
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 13:54 -0700, Alex Chiang wrote:
> To me, the BIOS concerns are moot. I work closely with the BIOS
> engineers for this platform; I have knowledge of future plans for
> this BIOS and platform; and I know that they will not make any
> changes that break the assumptions in my patch.
> 
> If they do, we will catch it during platform testing, file a bug,
> and not let them release their BIOS until it's fixed. Does that
> satisfy you? :)
> 
> So the algorithm for mapping an APIC ID to a physical/chassis ID
> for this platform will not ever change.
What happens if there is some genuine reason to do that because of some
other platform workaround etc?
> I am leaning towards sysfs, and prefer:
> 
>  	/sys/devices/system/cpu/$cpu/chassis_id
> 
Looks fine to me.
thanks,
suresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
