[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <420676341.3665461250802826403.JavaMail.root@zimbra3-e1.priv.proxad.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:13:46 +0200 (CEST)
From: dimitri.gorokhovik@...e.fr
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>,
Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>,
Scott James Remnant <scott@...onical.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>,
David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nftl: fix offset alignments
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> a écrit :
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:06:28 +0200 (CEST) dimitri.gorokhovik@...e.fr
> wrote:
> ...
> > + typeof(offs) mask = mtd->writesize - 1;
>
> I see no reason to use typeof here. Plain old
>
> loff_t mask = mtd->writesize - 1;
>
> would be more conventional.
I use typeoff in this way to guard masking code against absent-minded
modifications.
Attached is a corrected version as suggested.
Maybe Julia can come up with a clever rule for detecting unusual masking
operations automatically :-) ?
---
From: Dimitri Gorokhovik <dimitri.gorokhovik@...e.fr>
Subject: nftl: fix offset alignments
Arithmetic conversion in the mask computation makes the upper word
of the second argument passed down to mtd->read_oob(), be always 0
(assuming 'offs' being a 64-bit signed long long type, and
'mtd->writesize' being a 32-bit unsigned int type).
This patch applies over the other one adding masking in nftl_write,
"nftl: write support is broken".
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Gorokhovik <dimitri.gorokhovik@...e.fr>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
Cc: Scott James Remnant <scott@...onical.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nftlcore.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nftlcore.c b/drivers/mtd/nftlcore.c
index 665d3eb..1002e18 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nftlcore.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nftlcore.c
@@ -135,16 +135,17 @@ static void nftl_remove_dev(struct mtd_blktrans_dev *dev)
int nftl_read_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t offs, size_t len,
size_t *retlen, uint8_t *buf)
{
+ loff_t mask = mtd->writesize - 1;
struct mtd_oob_ops ops;
int res;
ops.mode = MTD_OOB_PLACE;
- ops.ooboffs = offs & (mtd->writesize - 1);
+ ops.ooboffs = offs & mask;
ops.ooblen = len;
ops.oobbuf = buf;
ops.datbuf = NULL;
- res = mtd->read_oob(mtd, offs & ~(mtd->writesize - 1), &ops);
+ res = mtd->read_oob(mtd, offs & ~mask, &ops);
*retlen = ops.oobretlen;
return res;
}
@@ -155,16 +156,17 @@ int nftl_read_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t offs, size_t len,
int nftl_write_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t offs, size_t len,
size_t *retlen, uint8_t *buf)
{
+ loff_t mask = mtd->writesize - 1;
struct mtd_oob_ops ops;
int res;
ops.mode = MTD_OOB_PLACE;
- ops.ooboffs = offs & (mtd->writesize - 1);
+ ops.ooboffs = offs & mask;
ops.ooblen = len;
ops.oobbuf = buf;
ops.datbuf = NULL;
- res = mtd->write_oob(mtd, offs & ~(mtd->writesize - 1), &ops);
+ res = mtd->write_oob(mtd, offs & ~mask, &ops);
*retlen = ops.oobretlen;
return res;
}
@@ -177,17 +179,18 @@ int nftl_write_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t offs, size_t len,
static int nftl_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t offs, size_t len,
size_t *retlen, uint8_t *buf, uint8_t *oob)
{
+ loff_t mask = mtd->writesize - 1;
struct mtd_oob_ops ops;
int res;
ops.mode = MTD_OOB_PLACE;
- ops.ooboffs = offs & (mtd->writesize - 1);
+ ops.ooboffs = offs & mask;
ops.ooblen = mtd->oobsize;
ops.oobbuf = oob;
ops.datbuf = buf;
ops.len = len;
- res = mtd->write_oob(mtd, offs & ~(mtd->writesize - 1), &ops);
+ res = mtd->write_oob(mtd, offs & ~mask, &ops);
*retlen = ops.retlen;
return res;
}
--
1.6.3.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists